|
You are here:
Home >
Media > Trade falls victim to
Mumbai attack
Trade falls victim to Mumbai
attack
Asia Times, December 11, 2008
Increased tension following the
terrorist attack in Mumbai last month, which killed nearly 200
people in India's financial capital, has set back attempts to
improve near moribund trade between close-to-bankrupt Pakistan and
India.
Proposed secretary-level talks on
enhancing trade ties between the two countries scheduled for this
month in Islamabad have been postponed for an indefinite period,
even as Pakistan denies direct involvement in the attack on
civilians by gunmen. Ministerial-level talks that had been scheduled
to be held in New Delhi on December 2 had already been postponed.
Heightened hostility between the
two neighbors in the wake of the Mumbai attacks comes after four
years of improved bilateral trade, albeit from an almost
non-existent base. The scope for further growth is glaringly
obvious. For example, India, the world's biggest tea producer, wants
to triple tea exports to Pakistan, the world's third-biggest buyer.
In the other direction, Pakistan aims to capture more of the cement
market in India's still expanding economy.
India, which exports about a
quarter of its annual 800-million kilogram tea output, "Planned to
boost sales to Pakistan to more than 20 million kilograms in the
next three years ... from 5.47 million kilograms in 2007," Basudeb
Banerjee, chairman of the state-run Tea Board of India, said after
the attack, according to Bloomberg. The target may not be met after
India blamed "elements" within Pakistan for the assaults, he said.
India is seeking to diversify from
traditional markets, including Russia, where demand for tea and
other commodities has declined because of the credit crisis.
India is the most feasible cement
market for Pakistan, where companies have already completed adding
capacity to reap possible benefits from India's rising demand for
the commodity. Islamabad is committed to export about 100,000 tons
of cement per month to India.
Pakistan offers India the most
competitive transportation charges compared with other overseas
sources in the region and Delhi has shown a willingness to take in
the maximum that it can from Pakistan through sea and land routes by
abolishing countervailing duties and additional customs duties on
cement imports.
Before the Mumbai attack, the two
countries had undertaken negotiations to remove bilateral trade
barriers, which have increased the cost of doing business and led to
trade being routed through Singapore, Hong Kong and elsewhere.
Direct trade between India and Pakistan is not more than US$250
million a year of a total bilateral trade worth $2 billion.
The two countries were looking to
raise bilateral trade to $10 billion a year after trade talks
resumed between the two neighbors in 2003. The bilateral trade
balance is strongly in favor of India, which exports 75% of the
total and imports only 25%.
The outlook for improved
cross-border links will severely diminish if Pakistan reacts to
challenges that is was involved in the Mumbai attacks by diverting
troops from the Afghan border to its border with India, a prospect
Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari has sought to diminish,
"Non-state actors wanted to force upon the governments their own
agenda but they must not be allowed to succeed," Zardari reportedly
told Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh by telephone.
A New York Times analysis last
month argued that Zardari's background would act in favor of
improved ties, not least because his financially beleaguered country
has had to turn in the past month to the International Monetary Fund
to help it pay off international creditors.
"A businessman at heart, Mr Zardari
understands the benefit of strong trade between India and Pakistan.
Now on life support from the IMF, Pakistan would profit immensely
from the normalization of relations," the New York Times said.
The most immediate barrier to trade
has been inadequate cross-border transport facilities. The two
sides, still deeply suspicious of each other after a number of wars
and armed clashes since they became independent of British rule in
1947, have agreed to allow trucks to move within about one kilometer
of each other's border and to build truck terminal facilities.
Pakistan has developed one such terminal at Wagha, on the Grand
Trunk Road between Amritsar in India and Lahore in Pakistan, with
space for about 100 vehicles. India has yet to construct a
comparable facility on its side of the border at Attari.
Progress is more apparent in
sea-going trade, after Islamabad and New Delhi in late 2006 signed a
shipping protocol allowing flagships of both the countries to carry
third-country cargo from each other's ports, restoring direct
shipping links between the two countries after 35 years. Pakistan
also added 202 more items on its list of imports allowed from India.
Reflecting the lost opportunities
caused by continued hostility, Malik Sohail Hussain, vice president
of Pakistan's National Traders Alliance, said trade and commerce
should not be made victims of politics, and confrontational postures
would hurt both Pakistan and India, according to the country's
Business Recorder newspaper. "Bilateral trade is less than $1.5
billion while it should have been $10 billion," Hussain quoted as
saying. "The standard of living of the people of the sub-continent
cannot be enhanced without bilateral trade and we cannot live in
tension or by ignoring each other."
While Pakistan is having to defend
itself against claims that is helping to perpetrate terrorism
outside its borders, it has suffered numerous attacks at home,
particularly since the coalition government that took power early
this year stepped up the fight against extremists in tribal areas
near the Afghanistan border. Among them, at least 60 people died in
a suicide attack on the Marriott hotel in Islamabad in September. In
the first week of December, a bomb blast in Peshawar in North-West
Frontier Province killed at least 22 people and wounded 80.
"While the terrorists may try to
derail the peace process between Pakistan and India, we should not
allow them to succeed in their nefarious designs," said Pakistan's
Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani. Speaking at a dinner hosted for
European Union heads of mission last week, he said Pakistan was
ready to engage India closely to expose the hidden hand behind the
Mumbai terror attacks. Relaxed tensions in the sub-continent would
certainly be to the benefit of the US.
"A rapprochement with India would
permit the Pakistani government to devote more military resources to
the fight against terrorists," The Washington Post said in a
November 29 editorial. "The United States, in what's left of the
[George W] Bush administration's term and right from the start of
[president-elect Barack] Obama's administration, must continue
nudging these two rivals toward cooperation. As the bloodbath in
Mumbai so vividly illustrates, terrorism is not only America's
enemy, but Pakistan's and India's as well."
The United States could play a role
in improving trade between Pakistan and India by offering duty-free
imports if one of the sub-continental countries used the other's
inputs in their exportable items to the US, according to study by
CUTS International, an India-based research and networking group.
The study cited a scheme instituted in 1996 that allows duty-free
exports to the US market from Jordan and Egypt given a minimum level
of inputs from Israel in the manufacturing of these products.
Even so, while trade can help in
normalizing relations between the two archrivals, expecting more
peaceful relations between the two economies through trade is a
dream, the report said.
The author is a Quetta-based
development analyst in Pakistan and can be reached at
sfazlehaider05@yahoo.com
This news item can also be viewed
at:
http://www.atimes.com/
|