|
You are here:
Home >
Media > North should not grudge
large, emerging economies: Nath
North should not grudge large,
emerging economies: Nath
Zee News, July 29, 2008
In a sharp retort to comments by
the US that countries like India and China were disrupting the
ongoing WTO trade talks, India on Monday said the developed
countries should not grudge the fact developing nations are large
and emerging economies.
"Some developed countries have said
large and emerging countries were creating problem in the talks. We
are large I cannot help that we are emerging, nobody should grudge
that," Commerce and Industry Minister Kamal Nath said after coming
from an WTO meeting here.
The ongoing meeting of 30 key trade
ministers here has spilled over to the second week with negotiators
making some progress in talks on Friday to open markets and cut
subsidies in agriculture and industrial goods.
As per the draft presented by WTO
chief Pascal Lamy on Friday, only 12 per cent of agricultural tariff
lines can be Special Products and within this, five per cent would
take zero cut in duties.
Nath said when the so-called
package was announced on Friday India has not agreed on all elements
of the package.
India has serious concerns on
overall trade distorting support (OTDS) and the non-mentioning of
the cotton.
"I was hoping that since the text
was presented on Friday, in the next three days there would have
been some movement on OTDS, SSM clause, which is a clause for 90
countries," Nath added.
The US today blamed India and China
for creating hurdles in the ongoing WTO talks here and said Doha
trade talks have been thrown into the "gravest jeopardy" by these
two countries which are not willing to open their markets for more
imports.
"Their (India's and China's)
actions have thrown the entire Doha Round -- the Doha Development
Round - into the gravest jeopardy in its nearly seven-year life," a
US trade official told ministers at ongoing WTO meeting.
US Trade Representative Susan
Schwab too voiced her frustration against the stand taken by
developing economies.
Nath however said he is still
optimistic about the conclusion of the round and hoped that there
would be some movement on the OTDS and special safeguard mechanism.
"Let me give you the good news that
negotiations are still going on," he said.
Earlier US Trade Representative
Susan Schwab said the US was concerned about the direction a couple
of countries were taking in the negotiations. In a veiled attack on
India and China, Schwab said, "We are in a situation where one
country is not part to the original agreement and one country is
backtracking on its commitment made to us on Friday".
She said negotiators had reached a
"real path forward" last Friday to a successful conclusion of the
Doha Development round.
"Six out of the seven in the
leadership group embraced the outcome of Friday, which represented a
delicate balance," she said.
"This is a real risk as these
countries were advocating selectively reopening the package. This is
a threat to the delicate balance and I am concerned it will
jeopardise the outcome of this round," she said adding that "
unfortunately a couple of players have decided that the balance can
rebounce in their own favour in 1-2 items".
Retorting to Schwab's comments,
Nath said there was no doubt in anybody's mind that out of the group
of seven, India did not agree to the proposals brought out by WTO
Chief Pascal Lamy on Friday.
India is being marginalised
India is getting increasingly
marginalised at the WTO mini-ministerial meet at Geneva as the
country's Commerce Minister was not allowed to negotiate "freely"
and there was pressure from rich nations to open Indian markets, a
senior official of CUTS said on Monday.
Quoting Commerce and Industry
Minister Kamal Nath as saying "I am not allowed to negotiate",
Secretary General of CUTS, a consumer policy research and advocacy
group, Pradeep S Mehta said most of the India's concerns on market
access in agriculture and industry have either been rejected or
diluted.
"This is symptomatic of the
negotiating style which the rich follow to brow beat the poor, just
overwhelm otherwise call them spoilsports," Mehta said.
He said Indian Minister has
asserted that the talks were becoming more like advancing the
interests of prosperous classes while ignoring those whose
livelihood security depends crucially on trade and trade-related
matters.
Cotton subsidies 'deal breakers'
Issues like cotton subsidies and
safeguard mechanism for import surges still remain the main
obstacles for clinching the Doha agreement for opening the world
market even as ongoing WTO Ministerial talks entered second week
here on Monday.
"Cotton subsidies, special
safeguard mechanism and sectorals are the three major deal breakers
that are still on the table," a senior Indian official said.
He said not much movement has been
made on cotton subsidies, with the US refusing to engage with the
Cotton 4 group of West African cotton producers -- Benin, Burkina
Faso, Chad and Mali.
The Hong Kong Ministerial
declaration had stated that the cotton subsidies should be
"eliminated more ambitiously and expeditiously" by the US than its
Overall Trade Distorting Support (OTDS).
"This means that if the US agrees
to cut its OTDS by 70 per cent, it would be required to slash its
cotton subdisies by 75 per cent in two years from the date of
implementation of a global trade deal," the official said.
At present, the US doles out
subsidies of 3.8 billion dollars to its estimated 24,800 cotton
farmers.
Cotton is a crucial issue not only
for the African continent but also for India and Brazil, the
official said, adding that if the US cuts its cotton subsidies,
farmers in these countries would get better price for their produce.
The subsidies lead to over
production in the US, taking away export markets and business from
millions of farmers in Africa. India is a major producer, consumer
and exporter of cotton and has deep interests in this issue.
The five-day meeting of 30 key
trade ministers has spilled over to the second week with negotiators
making some progress in talks to open markets and cut subsidies in
agriculture and industrial goods.
New draft texts are expected to
come out later in the day in agriculture and NAMA (non-agricultural
market access).
"During the negotiations this week,
India has shown considerable flexibility with the objective of
enabling the negotiations to move ahead towards conclusion," India
said in its statement to the Trade Negotiating Committee today.
India is also pushing for more
space to protect its farm products from tariff cuts. As per the
latest Lamy draft, only 12 per cent of agricultural tariff lines can
be Special Products and within this, five per cent would take zero
cut in duties. But the 12 per cent as a whole would still have an
average overall cut of 11 per cent.
The official said the overall cut
of 11 per cent is "a little to high and this has to be lowered".
This news item can also be viewed
at:
http://www.zeenews.com/ |