|
You are here:
Home >
Media > 'Let's do trade, peace will
follow'
interview
'Let's do trade,
peace will follow'
www.jang.com, July 27,
2008
By Shahzada Irfan Ahmed
Pradeep S Mehta is the founder
secretary general of the Jaipur-based Consumer Unity & Trust Society
(CUTS International), one of the largest consumer groups in India
established in 1983-84. It has overseas centres in London, Geneva,
Lusaka, Nairobi and Hanoi.
Mehta has also served on several
policy-making bodies of the Government of India, related to trade,
environment and consumer affairs, including the National Advisory
Committee on International Trade of the Ministry of Commerce and its
working groups. Besides, he chairs the advisory board of the South
Asia Network on Trade, Economics and Environment, Kathmandu and has
also been an NGO Adviser to the Director General, WTO, Geneva,
Switzerland.
Recently he was on a personal visit
to Lahore during which The News on Sunday got a chance to interview
him in the backdrop of Pak government's decision to increase imports
from India. Excerpts follow:
The News on Sunday: The PPP
government is being criticised for announcing an 'India-centric'
trade policy while many outstanding issues between the two states
remain unresolved. What would you say on this?
Pradeep S Mehta:
First, let me congratulate the Government of Pakistan on this
visionary, bold and pro-Pakistan step. However, I would like to make
a correction. It was Pakistan, sometime ago, under President
Musharraf which first decided to put other bilateral matters on hold
and concentrate more on bilateral and regional trade. This means
even an army chief had to change his stance and focus his attention
on issues related to trade and other fields where the people of the
two countries could cooperate. About the second part of the question
I would say the trade policy of Pakistan is not at all country
specific. I feel the decision has been taken only for the reason
that cheap imports from India, especially those of industrial raw
materials, are the best option the country has to stay competitive
in the international market, and also curb inflation.
I don't want to say that the two
countries must forget the outstanding issues between them. What I am
suggesting is that these countries must not link mutual trade with
the resolution of some difficult issues. I am sure peace will follow
if trade is allowed to grow freely. You may call it 'peace dividend'
if you want to use a pure economic term. This is by no means a
utopian thought. Brazil and Argentina, who were once at daggers
drawn with each other, had to abandon their nuclear programmes and
concentrate mainly on mutual trade. As a result smaller neighbouring
countries of that region have also benefited.
TNS:
Pakistan already has a yawning trade deficit with India which may
increase manifold if the said trade policy is implemented. How do
you think can Pakistan overcome this worry?
PSM:
Here I would try to remove a misperception that trade deficit is
detrimental to an economy's growth or survival. What if Pakistan has
trade deficit with India? It also has a trade deficit with China.
The United States has had trade deficit with the rest of the world,
forever. Even China has trade deficit with India. It's a fact that
out of the $30 billion India-China trade, Indian exports have an
overwhelming share. China imports cheap raw material from India and
sells the finished goods to the world. I think Pakistan can also
benefit from the import of cheap Indian raw materials and minimise
the ever-increasing costs of production its industry is burdened
with.
Another count on which Pakistan can
gain a lot is the transportation cost. The cost of transporting
goods from the neighbouring India is much cheaper than getting them
from distant countries. With global fuel prices constantly on the
rise the transport cost factor is becoming more and more
significant. About the import of cheap finished goods, it is very
much expected that some businesses will shut down for being
non-competitive. It happened in India too, when we had to liberalise
the import of consumer goods. But at the same time the end consumers
will have the opportunity to buy cheaper goods. Everywhere in the
world imports are used to control prices and promote healthy
competition.
TNS:
There is a perception among many Pakistanis that the goodwill
measures have been one-sided. They say while Pakistan is opening up
its market, India has not shunned its habit of imposing non-tariff
barriers on imports from Pakistan.
PSM:
The perception is very much there on both sides of the border. But
the fact is that they are mostly the sector lobbies that try to
protect their interests by pressurising their respective
governments. For example the Indian cement industry opposed cement
imports from Pakistan on grounds that the product does not meet
international quality standards. But finally the imports were
allowed. My point is that if Pakistanis are using the same cement
and their buildings are not coming down, there's no harm importing
it. Similarly the Pakistani sugar industry kept on propagating for
long that Indian sugar has excessive phosphorus content which is
harmful to health. Here I would say if Indians can consume the same
sugar without getting affected why can't Pakistanis have it. Some
imports have often been opposed on religious grounds. In this
respect I would say if the Arab states can import packed buffalo
meat why can't any other Muslim country. In the overall context, if
Pakistan liberalises imports from India, let me assure you that
India will not lag behind. With the high growth in India, the market
is huge and can absorb many goods from Pakistan, whether
intermediates or finished goods.
TNS:
How helpful can import of fuel from India be for Pakistan? Do you
think the two countries can work together to overcome the deepening
energy crises especially that faces Pakistan?
PSM:
Here I would try to remove a misperception that trade deficit is
detrimental to an economy's growth or survival. What if Pakistan has
trade deficit with India? It also has a trade deficit with China.
The United States has had trade deficit with the rest of the world,
forever. Even India has trade deficit with China. It's a fact that
out of the $30bn India-China trade, Chinese exports have an
overwhelming share. China imports cheap raw material from India and
sells the finished goods to the world. I think Pakistan can also
benefit from the import of cheap Indian raw materials and minimise
the ever-increasing costs of production its industry is burdened
with.
Another project that can bring
India and Pakistan closer and help meet their energy needs is the
proposed gas pipeline that will come to India from Iran and pass
through Pakistan. Pakistan will be able to earn a huge rental if
this project gets through as well as get its share of the natural
gas passing through it. India cannot sell electricity to Pakistan as
it is facing energy crisis itself. It is as severe as the one
haunting Pakistan. It's a fact that hardly 10 years back India was
planning to buy 500 megawatt electricity from Pakistan. It is
strange that the same country, which had surplus energy at that
time, is unable to meet its domestic needs. Down the line, new
investments in the power sector in Pakistan did not happen. That is
something which your government should address more seriously.
TNS:
You seem quite optimistic. But how can you convince those who fear
smaller economies in South Asia will collapse due to India's
exponential economic growth?
PSM:
This is another Cassandraic and poorly-argued thought. All economies
of the region can ride on the bandwagon of India's huge economic
growth and gain. That has been the experience around similar
situations. Let me take the example of Vietnam which is growing at
10 percent per annum for long, in spite of the giant China. One
critical factor is that the government in Vietnam has kept their
economy open, rather than close it to competition. This only goes on
to prove my point. Saath chalen gay tu sab ka fayda hoga!
(Revised on: August 08, 2008)
This interview can also be viewed
at:
http://jang.com.pk/
|