|
You are here:
Home >
Media > Keep On Talking
Keep On Talking
Outlook Business, January 09, 2010
What Doha is for trade,
Copenhagen may turn out to be for environment. Both are cities
where the world first congregated to find common ground on an
important matter, and then struggled to find any. In spite of good
intentions, the gulf between the developed world and the
developing world remains too deep and too wide to be bridged in
one meeting. Or, in the case of trade talks under the umbrella of
the World Trade Organisation (WTO), eight years and nine meetings.
The repeated failure to reach a consensus at multilateral
forums—where every nation has an equal vote—raises two fundamental
questions: is multilateralism a failure and should we give up on
it?
“Who says
WTO is a failure?” asks a visibly agitated Partha Mukhopadhyay,
Senior Research Fellow at the New Delhi-based think tank Centre for
Policy Research. “Just because we haven’t reached a consensus on
Doha doesn’t mean the forum has become irrelevant.” He points out
that anti-dumping cases and disputes are being resolved through this
forum.
|
|
|
|
| |
Smaller nations can
bargain better as sub-groups than they would through
bilateral pacts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mukhopadhyay argues that multilateralism, not bilateralism, is the
best forum for developing countries. “By forming sub-groups within
the multilateral forum, they can exercise far greater bargaining
power than they would through bilateral pacts,” he says. A case in
point is the inability of the US to pressure developing nations into
significantly reducing per capita emission or opening up their
markets to its agricultural products. “The process may take longer,
but it’s more democratic and the outcomes are more acceptable,” says
Mukhopadhyay.
Even in
matters of climate change, multilateral talks are the only way out,
says Pradeep S Mehta, Secretary General of the Jaipur-based Consumer
Unity and Trust Society (CUTS), a consumer group. “There is no point
in having limited multilateralism for climate change. It’s a
universal problem that everyone needs to sign on,” he adds. Mehta
feels that unlike trade talks, which face stiff opposition from
anti-globalisation forces, agreements to tackle climate change could
have an easier passage. “The world is committed to preventing global
warming,” he says. “Only the details of the pact have to be worked
out. That may not be too difficult.”
Multilateralism will find ways to become more relevant. The world
doesn’t have a choice. In environment matters, Mehta calls for
“mini-lateralism”. “We need some kind of consensus among the four
main players—the US, the European Union, China and India—to make
multilateralism work,” he says. In fact, the genesis of a solution
is already there: countries have pledged to cut emissions. A little
effort from the big nations will seal the deal for the world. And
for multilateralism.
This
news item can also be viewed at:
http://business.outlookindia.com/ |