|
You are here:
Home >
Media > India wants fresh WTO
drafts, seeks fair deal
India wants fresh WTO drafts,
seeks fair deal
The Financial Express,
July 03, 2008
India has pointed out to the World
Trade Organisation (WTO) that for a successful conclusion of the
Doha Round negotiations, it is important to release a revised
negotiation text—each on agriculture and industrial goods—ahead of
the crucial meeting of a group of ministers on July 21. The revised
negotiation text shouldincorporate the sensitivities of developing
countries, including India, it has said.
Officials close to the negotiation
said if the respective Chairs of agriculture and non-agricultural
market access (Nama or industrial goods) do not bring out a revised
negotiation text by July 10, there is a likelihood of WTO
director-general Pascal Lamy intervening and coming out with a ‘Lamy
draft’ to prevent the collapse of the Round. Lamy’s predecessor
Arthur Dunkel had come out with a draft (Dunkel draft) to save the
talks in the Uruguay Round. A Lamy draft can then become the
benchmark for future negotiations, in case the talks fizzle out this
time, sources said.
New Delhi also warned once again
that if the revised texts do not ensure protection of India’s poor
farmers and infant and small & medium industries, it would not be
party to any deal. “If we feel that the deal is not fair, then there
would be no agreement. It is important that the final deal must
result in correction of structural flaws in global trade. It should
ensure fair trade and not just free trade,” a senior government
official said.
Sources said commerce and industry
minister Kamal Nath had written to Lamy regarding the need for fresh
drafts that specifically contain the demands of developing
countries, including India. He had said last week that since a large
number of gaps still remain, there was a lot of work that needs to
be done to help the group of ministers meeting arrive at some
convergence.
One of the demands of India and its
industry is that the anti-concentration clause must be removed from
the draft Nama text. As per the Anti-Concentration Clause, sensitive
tariff lines that would not be subject to tariff reduction cannot be
concentrated in one particular sector.
India Inc has alleged that the
inclusion of anti-concentration clause in the Nama text was done at
the behest of a few developed countries with a complete disregard to
development dimension of Doha Round. They said the clause would hurt
SMEs in India as several sensitive sectorswould then be vulnerable
to tariff reductions. Pradeep S Mehta, trade expert and secretary
general, CUTS International, said India must also ask for an
anti-concentration clause in the list of sensitive products that the
rich countries would be seeking a carve out for.
What has also irked several
countries including India is the recent new US Farm Bill that has
hiked subsidies for American farmers, at a time when developing
countries have been demanding that the US must drastically cut its
“trade distorting” agricultural subsidies. US instead wants the
developing countries to liberalise their industrial goods markets by
reducing duties. “The US has no manoeuvrability now, especially
since they would find it very difficult to reduce their farm
subsidies due to the Farm Bill,” an official said.
Trade experts are not very
optimistic about a successful conclusion of the Doha Round in the
immediate future. Nagesh Kumar, director-general, Research and
Information System for Developing Countries, New Delhi, said, “The
position of all the countries are very entrenched and is unlikely to
change in the last minute. “
Though it is clear that Lamy was
trying his best for an early conclusion of the deal, it was
important that he must be able to persuade the US to deliver by
reducing their huge farm subsidies and giving more market access to
goods and services from developing countries, Kumar said....
This news item can also be viewed
at:
http://www.financialexpress.com
|