|
You
are here:
Home >
Articles > Doha Round failure
not...
Doha Round failure not
an option for economic recovery
Shanghai Daily, China, April 06, 2010
By
Pradeep S Mehta
THE imperative of concluding the Doha Round could
not have been captured better by a recent remark by WTO Director
General Pascal Lamy. "The Doha Round is not an island in a sea of
alternative opportunities - failure on Doha would spill over into
other present and future cooperation efforts, and not only in the
trade policy domain," he said at a recent meeting in Costa Rica.
This is a make or break year for the Doha Round.
The initial euphoria of many members was dampened as far back as
August 2003 when the Unites States and the European Union brought
forward a small package on agriculture to take to Cancun. However,
despite the anxiety of nations about the sustainability of
negotiations, some significant technical work has been accomplished in
the last few years. "Geographical indications" is an example on which
there has been forward movement.
In the area of non-tariff barriers, which will be
the major agenda in the future, there is a good hope of progress. In
the same vein, scheduling of agricultural tariffs is progressing. A
similar story of dynamism emerges in the matter of service sector
negotiations.
The moot question is why countries have not been
able to utilize this readiness to invest political capital to conclude
the Doha Round and take the world economy to higher levels of
well-being and productivity.
Prima facie it may appear puzzling as studies have
revealed that the overall expected gains from the Doha Round will
result in a much bigger stimulus package than all bailout packages
taken together. The answer to this puzzle lies in the greed of some
nations overriding the option of bringing about a win-win situation
with modest gains. The Doha Round if concluded would produce a
minuscule increase in exports, far short of the US administration's
target of doubling exports over the next five years.
Instead of the Doha Round, the US administration
has signalled its intention to follow a weak dollar policy to meet its
targets. Some other countries trying to recover from the financial
crisis and its recessionary effects have resorted to protectionism to
rule out the import of adverse influences from the rest of the world.
Protectionism is clearly not the cure for
recession; rather it can trigger the collapse of economic recovery
that many countries (including some rich countries) have begun to
experience since the last quarter of 2009. Such protectionism by
developed countries will spell ruin for the poorest countries of the
world in sub-Saharan Africa by denying them the use of trade as an
engine of growth at a crucial juncture in their development.
We cannot wait forever to conclude the Doha Round
as otherwise other more contentious and unresolved trade-related
issues will continue to produce negative energy. As this article is
being written, positive developments are afoot in all major capitals
except Washington, where Obama hass unfortunately but temporarily
exhausted his finite political capital in successfully pushing through
a historic initiative on healthcare reform.
However, Obama's tenacity signals good times for
multilateralism. Having achieved a major victory in the domestic
arena, the time has come for him to marshal his political capital for
the facilitation of a major triumph in the multilateral arena by
convincing his domestic constituency of the imperative of concluding
the Doha Round.
The conclusion of the Doha Round in 2010 is an
imperative for success on many fronts - global welfare reaching a new
high through better exploitation of comparative advantages of
countries and the reversal of decline in faith in trade as an engine
of growth.
The
author is the Secretary General of CUTS International. Bipul Chatterji
of CUTS contributed to this article. The views are their own. Shanghai
Daily condensed the article.
This
article can also be viewed at:
http://www.shanghaidaily.com/
|